LANV
Price
$2.05
Change
-$0.08 (-3.76%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
239.74M
TPR
Price
$109.05
Change
+$1.25 (+1.16%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
22.7B
40 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

LANV vs TPR

Header iconLANV vs TPR Comparison
Open Charts LANV vs TPRBanner chart's image
Lanvin Group Holdings
Price$2.05
Change-$0.08 (-3.76%)
Volume$55.26K
Capitalization239.74M
Tapestry
Price$109.05
Change+$1.25 (+1.16%)
Volume$2.22M
Capitalization22.7B
LANV vs TPR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
LANV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LANV vs. TPR commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LANV is a Hold and TPR is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (LANV: $2.05 vs. TPR: $109.05)
Brand notoriety: LANV and TPR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LANV: 55% vs. TPR: 53%
Market capitalization -- LANV: $239.74M vs. TPR: $22.7B
LANV [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] is valued at $239.74M. TPR’s [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] market capitalization is $22.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry ranges from $295.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry is $40.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LANV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTPR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • LANV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TPR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, TPR is a better buy in the long-term than LANV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LANV’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TPR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LANV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TPR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TPR is a better buy in the short-term than LANV.

Price Growth

LANV (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) experienced а -1.91% price change this week, while TPR (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) price change was -4.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry was -2.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

TPR is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Catalog/Specialty Distribution (-2.50% weekly)

The catalog and specialty distribution industry includes companies that offer retail through mail-order houses, media, online social platforms, mobile apps and other channels outside of brick-and-mortar stores. Several companies in this business partner with retail companies to assist them with marketing, digital solutions, warehousing, and/or other distribution capabilities. In essence, the industry acts as a potential catalyst for retailers/brands to widen their reach among customers. Pinduoduo Inc., Qurate Retail, Inc. and Baozun are some of the major players in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TPR($22.7B) has a higher market cap than LANV($240M). TPR YTD gains are higher at: 69.027 vs. LANV (1.990). TPR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 526M vs. LANV (-122.6M). TPR has more cash in the bank: 1.12B vs. LANV (29.7M). LANV has less debt than TPR: LANV (441M) vs TPR (3.9B). TPR has higher revenues than LANV: TPR (7.01B) vs LANV (291M).
LANVTPRLANV / TPR
Capitalization240M22.7B1%
EBITDA-122.6M526M-23%
Gain YTD1.99069.0273%
P/E RatioN/A132.99-
Revenue291M7.01B4%
Total Cash29.7M1.12B3%
Total Debt441M3.9B11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TPR: Fundamental Ratings
TPR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
23
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7
SMR RATING
1..100
71
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LANVTPR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LANV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DNKEY21.700.49
+2.31%
Danske Bank A/S
MALRY27.030.07
+0.25%
Mineral Resources Ltd.
LRAXF1.60N/A
N/A
Lara Exploration Ltd.
WRDEF16.00N/A
N/A
Wereldhave NV
DSAIF0.07N/A
N/A
DEEPSPATIAL INC.

LANV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LANV and BGI have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LANV and BGI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LANV
1D Price
Change %
LANV100%
-3.76%
BGI - LANV
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
CPRI - LANV
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.74%
TPR - LANV
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
WOSGF - LANV
-2%
Poorly correlated
-2.48%
SIG - LANV
-2%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
More

TPR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TPR has been loosely correlated with MOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TPR jumps, then MOV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TPR
1D Price
Change %
TPR100%
+1.16%
MOV - TPR
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.64%
BURBY - TPR
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.92%
CFRUY - TPR
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
SIG - TPR
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
REAL - TPR
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.78%
More