Advertisement
LANDM vs NHPAP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LANDM is a Hold and NHPAP is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LANDM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNHPAP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LANDM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NHPAP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LANDM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NHPAP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LANDM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NHPAP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
LANDM (@Specialty Telecommunications) experienced а +0.10% price change this week, while NHPAP (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) price change was +2.16% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was +4.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.24%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was +0.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.86%.
Reported Earning Dates
NHPAP is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Telecommunications (+4.84% weekly)Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.
@Publishing: Books/Magazines (+0.56% weekly)The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.
| LANDM | NHPAP | LANDM / NHPAP | |
| Capitalization | N/A | N/A | - |
| EBITDA | 64.2M | 92M | 70% |
| Gain YTD | 0.482 | 0.486 | 99% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 68M | 346M | 20% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 480M | 1.04B | 46% |
NHPAP | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| LANDM | NHPAP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 10% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 6% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 39% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 5% | 2 days ago 45% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 5% | 2 days ago 43% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 2% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 4% | 7 days ago 45% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 3% | 10 days ago 45% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 5% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 62% |
Advertisement
LANDM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LANDM and REGCP have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LANDM and REGCP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LANDM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LANDM | 100% | -0.00% | ||
| REGCP - LANDM | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.24% | ||
| FPI - LANDM | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.19% | ||
| NHPAP - LANDM | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
| GLPI - LANDM | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
| SBAC - LANDM | 15% Poorly correlated | +1.64% | ||
More | ||||
NHPAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NHPAP has been loosely correlated with NHPBP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NHPAP jumps, then NHPBP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NHPAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NHPAP | 100% | -0.27% | ||
| NHPBP - NHPAP | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| EXR - NHPAP | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| CUBE - NHPAP | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.45% | ||
| PCH - NHPAP | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.42% | ||
| STAG - NHPAP | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.97% | ||
More | ||||