Advertisement
LANC vs RMCF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LANC is a Buy and RMCF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LANC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRMCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- LANC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- RMCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LANC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LANC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- RMCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
LANC (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -0.32% price change this week, while RMCF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +0.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +10.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.15%.
Reported Earning Dates
LANC is expected to report earnings on Aug 21, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (+10.38% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| LANC | RMCF | LANC / RMCF | |
| Capitalization | 5.67B | 22.9M | 24,769% |
| EBITDA | 244M | -4.36M | -5,600% |
| Gain YTD | -2.279 | -51.029 | 4% |
| P/E Ratio | 43.94 | 26.11 | 168% |
| Revenue | 1.87B | 28.8M | 6,483% |
| Total Cash | 134M | 2.08M | 6,436% |
| Total Debt | 13.3M | 2.87M | 463% |
LANC | RMCF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 6 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 50 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 90 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 85 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 36 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LANC's Valuation (61) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as RMCF (78). This means that LANC’s stock grew similarly to RMCF’s over the last 12 months.
LANC's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMCF (100). This means that LANC’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMCF’s over the last 12 months.
LANC's SMR Rating (50) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RMCF (97). This means that LANC’s stock grew somewhat faster than RMCF’s over the last 12 months.
LANC's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as RMCF (90). This means that LANC’s stock grew similarly to RMCF’s over the last 12 months.
RMCF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for LANC (85). This means that RMCF’s stock grew significantly faster than LANC’s over the last 12 months.
| LANC | RMCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 57% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 59% | 24 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 84% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HARD.X | 0.009702 | 0.000222 | +2.34% |
| Kava Lend cryptocurrency | |||
| GTC.X | 0.247281 | -0.003147 | -1.26% |
| Gitcoin cryptocurrency | |||
| XMR.X | 311.533400 | -6.994720 | -2.20% |
| Monero cryptocurrency | |||
| KSM.X | 15.192027 | -0.431574 | -2.76% |
| Kusama cryptocurrency | |||
| GLMR.X | 0.074425 | -0.002659 | -3.45% |
| Moonbeam cryptocurrency | |||
LANC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LANC has been loosely correlated with JBSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LANC jumps, then JBSS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LANC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LANC | 100% | -1.02% | ||
| JBSS - LANC | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.86% | ||
| FLO - LANC | 33% Loosely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| MDLZ - LANC | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| CENTA - LANC | 32% Poorly correlated | -3.76% | ||
| JJSF - LANC | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.90% | ||
More | ||||
RMCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RMCF and HLF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMCF and HLF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RMCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMCF | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| HLF - RMCF | 20% Poorly correlated | -4.72% | ||
| DAR - RMCF | 15% Poorly correlated | +9.15% | ||
| HSY - RMCF | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.74% | ||
| TR - RMCF | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.18% | ||
| LANC - RMCF | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.02% | ||
More | ||||