Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAMYX vs RWMFX
LAMYX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts LAMYX vs RWMFX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth I
Price$25.71
Change+$0.11 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.61B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.77
Change+$0.42 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.98B
LAMYX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMYX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMYX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 206B vs. LAMYX (4.61B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than LAMYX: RWMFX (1.43) vs LAMYX (0.81). LAMYX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: LAMYX (24 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). LAMYX (0.64) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. LAMYX (25.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAMYX: RWMFX (250) vs LAMYX (1000000). LAMYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.12 vs. RWMFX (5.69). LAMYX return over 5 years is better than : 61.49 vs. RWMFX (57.64).
| LAMYX | RWMFX | LAMYX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.31 | 206% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.31 | 206% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.003 | 9.760 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.61B | 206B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 1.43 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.12 | 5.69 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.76 | 46.35 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.49 | 57.64 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.25 | 93.97 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement