Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAMSX vs RWMFX
LAMSX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts LAMSX vs RWMFX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R4
Price$24.83
Change+$0.16 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.52B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.07
Change+$0.15 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.51B
LAMSX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMSX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMSX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 205B vs. LAMSX (4.53B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than LAMSX: RWMFX (1.43) vs LAMSX (0.59). LAMSX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: LAMSX (10 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). LAMSX (0.89) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. LAMSX (25.00). LAMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: LAMSX (0) vs RWMFX (250). LAMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.46 vs. RWMFX (7.95). LAMSX (53.11) and RWMFX (50.81) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAMSX | RWMFX | LAMSX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.31 | 287% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.31 | 287% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.040 | 8.213 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.53B | 205B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.59 | 1.43 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.46 | 7.95 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.86 | 34.82 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.11 | 50.81 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.35 | 83.34 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement