Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAMRX vs RWMFX
LAMRX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts LAMRX vs RWMFX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R3
Price$25.18
Change+$0.11 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.63B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.77
Change+$0.42 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.25B
LAMRX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMRX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMRX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. LAMRX (4.63B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than LAMRX: RWMFX (1.43) vs LAMRX (0.38). LAMRX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: LAMRX (18 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). LAMRX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. LAMRX (25.00). LAMRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: LAMRX (0) vs RWMFX (250). LAMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.49 vs. RWMFX (5.69). LAMRX (58.06) and RWMFX (57.64) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAMRX | RWMFX | LAMRX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.31 | 368% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.31 | 368% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.590 | 9.760 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.63B | 207B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.38 | 1.43 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.49 | 5.69 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.42 | 46.35 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.06 | 57.64 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.87 | 93.97 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers