Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAMQX vs RWMFX
LAMQX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts LAMQX vs RWMFX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R2
Price$25.74
Change+$0.12 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.63B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.77
Change+$0.42 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.25B
LAMQX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMQX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMQX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. LAMQX (4.63B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than LAMQX: RWMFX (1.43) vs LAMQX (0.28). LAMQX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: LAMQX (18 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). LAMQX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. LAMQX (25.00). LAMQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: LAMQX (0) vs RWMFX (250). LAMQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.51 vs. RWMFX (5.69). LAMQX (58.27) and RWMFX (57.64) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAMQX | RWMFX | LAMQX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.31 | 400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.31 | 400% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.545 | 9.760 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.63B | 207B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 1.43 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.51 | 5.69 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.48 | 46.35 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.27 | 57.64 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.32 | 93.97 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers