Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAMQX vs RWMFX
LAMQX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts LAMQX vs RWMFX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R2
Price$25.27
Change+$0.06 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.52B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.23
Change+$0.16 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.51B
LAMQX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMQX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMQX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 205B vs. LAMQX (4.53B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than LAMQX: RWMFX (1.43) vs LAMQX (0.28). LAMQX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: LAMQX (18 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). LAMQX (1.24) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. LAMQX (25.00). LAMQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: LAMQX (0) vs RWMFX (250). LAMQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.13 vs. RWMFX (7.95). LAMQX (51.64) and RWMFX (50.81) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAMQX | RWMFX | LAMQX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.31 | 400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.31 | 400% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.790 | 8.213 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.53B | 205B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 1.43 | 19% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.13 | 7.95 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.79 | 34.82 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.64 | 50.81 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.28 | 83.34 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement