Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAMHX vs VTSMX
LAMHX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts LAMHX vs VTSMX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth R6
Price$23.81
Change-$0.26 (-1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.26B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$142.86
Change-$1.69 (-1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82T
LAMHX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMHX vs. VTSMX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMHX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.82T vs. LAMHX (4.26B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than LAMHX: VTSMX (1.18) vs LAMHX (0.85). LAMHX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: LAMHX (10 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). LAMHX (0.59) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). LAMHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). LAMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: LAMHX (0) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.06 vs. LAMHX (6.64). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 91.36 vs. LAMHX (62.12).
| LAMHX | VTSMX | LAMHX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.14 | 421% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.14 | 421% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.324 | 1.349 | 246% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.26B | 1.82T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.18 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.64 | 10.06 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.56 | 57.59 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.12 | 91.36 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 178.92 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement