Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAMFX vs VTSMX
LAMFX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts LAMFX vs VTSMX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth F
Price$24.48
Change+$0.21 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.44B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$149.99
Change+$1.28 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82T
LAMFX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMFX vs. VTSMX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMFX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 1.82T vs. LAMFX (4.44B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than LAMFX: VTSMX (1.12) vs LAMFX (0.75). LAMFX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: LAMFX (18 years) vs VTSMX (33 years). LAMFX (0.74) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). LAMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). LAMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: LAMFX (0) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.89 vs. LAMFX (9.93). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 95.59 vs. LAMFX (65.19).
| LAMFX | VTSMX | LAMFX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.14 | 457% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.14 | 529% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.870 | 6.421 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.44B | 1.82T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.12 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.93 | 13.89 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.18 | 62.08 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.19 | 95.59 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.37 | 198.05 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement