Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAMFX vs RWMFX
LAMFX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts LAMFX vs RWMFX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth F
Price$25.10
Change+$0.17 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.52B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.07
Change+$0.15 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.51B
LAMFX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMFX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMFX is a StrongBuy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 205B vs. LAMFX (4.53B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than LAMFX: RWMFX (1.43) vs LAMFX (0.72). LAMFX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: LAMFX (18 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). LAMFX (0.74) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. LAMFX (25.00). LAMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: LAMFX (0) vs RWMFX (250). LAMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.76 vs. RWMFX (7.95). LAMFX return over 5 years is better than : 54.86 vs. RWMFX (50.81).
| LAMFX | RWMFX | LAMFX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.31 | 206% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.31 | 239% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.250 | 8.213 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.53B | 205B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 1.43 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.76 | 7.95 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.99 | 34.82 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.86 | 50.81 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.27 | 83.34 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement