Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAMCX vs VTSMX
LAMCX vs VTSMX Comparison
Open Charts LAMCX vs VTSMX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth C
Price$25.45
Change+$0.13 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.68B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx I
Price$163.42
Change+$0.09 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05T
LAMCX vs VTSMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMCX vs. VTSMX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMCX is a Buy and VTSMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSMX has more cash in the bank: 2.05T vs. LAMCX (4.69B). VTSMX pays higher dividends than LAMCX: VTSMX (1.02) vs LAMCX (0.00). LAMCX was incepted earlier than VTSMX: LAMCX (24 years) vs VTSMX (34 years). LAMCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than VTSMX (0.14). LAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VTSMX (2.00). LAMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSMX: LAMCX (1000) vs VTSMX (3000). VTSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.42 vs. LAMCX (5.47). VTSMX return over 5 years is better than : 83.98 vs. LAMCX (46.00).
| LAMCX | VTSMX | LAMCX / VTSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.14 | 1,171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.14 | 1,171% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.743 | 15.972 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.69B | 2.05T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.47 | 13.42 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.59 | 68.22 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.00 | 83.98 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.12 | 235.40 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement