Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAMCX vs VTSAX
LAMCX vs VTSAX Comparison
Open Charts LAMCX vs VTSAX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth C
Price$24.98
Change+$0.04 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.63B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Adm
Price$159.29
Change+$0.70 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.02T
LAMCX vs VTSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMCX vs. VTSAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMCX is a Buy and VTSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VTSAX has more cash in the bank: 2.02T vs. LAMCX (4.64B). VTSAX pays higher dividends than LAMCX: VTSAX (1.13) vs LAMCX (0.00). LAMCX was incepted earlier than VTSAX: LAMCX (24 years) vs VTSAX (25 years). LAMCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than VTSAX (0.04). LAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VTSAX (2.00). LAMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VTSAX: LAMCX (1000) vs VTSAX (3000). VTSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.81 vs. LAMCX (4.52). VTSAX return over 5 years is better than : 84.90 vs. LAMCX (47.27).
| LAMCX | VTSAX | LAMCX / VTSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.04 | 4,100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.04 | 4,100% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.624 | 13.023 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 3000 | 33% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.64B | 2.02T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.13 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.52 | 13.81 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.81 | 76.08 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.27 | 84.90 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.60 | 225.85 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement