Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAMCX vs VSTSX
LAMCX vs VSTSX Comparison
Open Charts LAMCX vs VSTSX
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth C
Price$22.81
Change-$0.25 (-1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.26B
Vanguard Total Stock Mkt Idx Instl Sel
Price$281.43
Change-$3.33 (-1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.82T
LAMCX vs VSTSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAMCX vs. VSTSX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAMCX is a Buy and VSTSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VSTSX has more cash in the bank: 1.82T vs. LAMCX (4.26B). VSTSX pays higher dividends than LAMCX: VSTSX (1.29) vs LAMCX (0.00). LAMCX was incepted earlier than VSTSX: LAMCX (23 years) vs VSTSX (9 years). LAMCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than VSTSX (0.01). LAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. VSTSX (2.00). LAMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VSTSX: LAMCX (1000) vs VSTSX (5000000000). VSTSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.09 vs. LAMCX (6.74). VSTSX return over 5 years is better than : 91.51 vs. LAMCX (55.30).
| LAMCX | VSTSX | LAMCX / VSTSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.01 | 16,400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.01 | 16,400% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.840 | 1.376 | 206% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 5000000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.26B | 1.82T | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.29 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.74 | 10.09 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.58 | 57.70 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.30 | 91.51 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement