Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAIDX vs TRIGX
LAIDX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts LAIDX vs TRIGX
Lord Abbett International Value I
Price$9.84
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets462.71M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$22.84
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.35B
LAIDX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAIDX vs. TRIGX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAIDX is a Hold and TRIGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.3B vs. LAIDX (463M). LAIDX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: LAIDX (3.06) vs TRIGX (1.91). LAIDX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: LAIDX (17 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). TRIGX (0.87) is less costly to investors than LAIDX (0.74). LAIDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAIDX: TRIGX (2500) vs LAIDX (1000000). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.26 vs. LAIDX (21.25). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 108.71 vs. LAIDX (74.06).
| LAIDX | TRIGX | LAIDX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.87 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.87 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.391 | 34.432 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 463M | 16.3B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.06 | 1.91 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.25 | 27.26 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.95 | 99.99 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.06 | 108.71 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.49 | 100.18 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers