Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAIDX vs TRIGX
LAIDX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts LAIDX vs TRIGX
Lord Abbett International Value I
Price$11.40
Change+$1.57 (+15.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets521.2M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$25.75
Change+$2.94 (+12.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets17.14B
LAIDX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAIDX vs. TRIGX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAIDX is a StrongBuy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 17.1B vs. LAIDX (521M). LAIDX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: LAIDX (2.61) vs TRIGX (2.47). LAIDX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: LAIDX (18 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). TRIGX (0.81) is less costly to investors than LAIDX (0.74). LAIDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 66.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAIDX: TRIGX (2500) vs LAIDX (1000000). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.40 vs. LAIDX (43.89). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 101.32 vs. LAIDX (71.91).
| LAIDX | TRIGX | LAIDX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.81 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.81 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.143 | 8.284 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 521M | 17.1B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.61 | 2.47 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 43.89 | 50.40 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.10 | 85.64 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.91 | 101.32 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.21 | 163.24 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers