Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAIDX vs TRIGX
LAIDX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts LAIDX vs TRIGX
Lord Abbett International Value I
Price$9.51
Change-$0.13 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets450.49M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$20.92
Change-$0.28 (-1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.05B
LAIDX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAIDX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAIDX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 15B vs. LAIDX (450M). LAIDX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: LAIDX (2.88) vs TRIGX (2.11). LAIDX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: LAIDX (17 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). TRIGX (0.87) is less costly to investors than LAIDX (0.74). LAIDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAIDX: TRIGX (2500) vs LAIDX (1000000). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.76 vs. LAIDX (20.92). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 96.83 vs. LAIDX (72.15).
| LAIDX | TRIGX | LAIDX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.87 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.87 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.272 | 23.131 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 450M | 15B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 2.11 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.92 | 23.76 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.03 | 66.38 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 72.15 | 96.83 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.44 | 68.52 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement