Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAGWX vs WCMNX
LAGWX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts LAGWX vs WCMNX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth A
Price$25.36
Change-$0.19 (-0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.59
Change-$0.03 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.97M
LAGWX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAGWX vs. WCMNX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAGWX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAGWX has more cash in the bank: 2.02B vs. WCMNX (43M). LAGWX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: LAGWX (0.02) vs WCMNX (0.00). LAGWX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: LAGWX (52 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than LAGWX (0.94). LAGWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). LAGWX (1000) and WCMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LAGWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.16 vs. WCMNX (1.42). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 11.12 vs. LAGWX (-13.04).
| LAGWX | WCMNX | LAGWX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.24 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.04 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.164 | 7.092 | 186% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.02B | 43M | 4,686% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.16 | 1.42 | 787% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.31 | 32.97 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.04 | 11.12 | -117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement