Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAGWX vs WCMNX
LAGWX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts LAGWX vs WCMNX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth A
Price$24.40
Change-$1.33 (-5.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.03B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.05
Change-$0.44 (-3.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.88M
LAGWX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAGWX vs. WCMNX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAGWX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAGWX has more cash in the bank: 2.03B vs. WCMNX (41.9M). LAGWX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: LAGWX (0.02) vs WCMNX (0.00). LAGWX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: LAGWX (52 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than LAGWX (0.94). LAGWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). LAGWX (1000) and WCMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LAGWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.41 vs. WCMNX (-3.16). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 3.45 vs. LAGWX (-13.20).
| LAGWX | WCMNX | LAGWX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.24 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.04 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.815 | 6.304 | 235% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.03B | 41.9M | 4,833% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.41 | -3.16 | -266% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.99 | 22.08 | 204% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.20 | 3.45 | -383% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.05 | N/A | - |