Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAGWX vs WCMLX
LAGWX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LAGWX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth A
Price$26.12
Change+$0.30 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.04B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.06
Change+$0.20 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.36M
LAGWX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAGWX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAGWX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAGWX has more cash in the bank: 2.04B vs. WCMLX (44.4M). LAGWX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . LAGWX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LAGWX (52 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LAGWX (0.94). LAGWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LAGWX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LAGWX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). LAGWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.84 vs. WCMLX (0.86). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.74 vs. LAGWX (-6.83).
| LAGWX | WCMLX | LAGWX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.99 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.79 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.555 | 9.331 | 177% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 44.4M | 4,597% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.84 | 0.86 | 911% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.31 | 23.77 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.83 | 1.74 | -393% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.00 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement