Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAGWX vs WCMLX
LAGWX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LAGWX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth A
Price$26.92
Change+$1.02 (+3.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.64
Change+$0.83 (+6.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
LAGWX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAGWX vs. WCMLX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAGWX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAGWX has more cash in the bank: 2.05B vs. WCMLX (47.1M). LAGWX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . LAGWX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LAGWX (52 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LAGWX (0.94). LAGWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LAGWX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LAGWX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). LAGWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.85 vs. WCMLX (8.52). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -5.30 vs. LAGWX (-21.77).
| LAGWX | WCMLX | LAGWX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.99 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.79 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.033 | 6.395 | 79% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 47.1M | 4,359% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.85 | 8.52 | 221% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.38 | 19.51 | 227% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.77 | -5.30 | 410% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.51 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement