Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAGWX vs WCMLX
LAGWX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LAGWX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth A
Price$25.36
Change-$0.19 (-0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.79
Change-$0.04 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.97M
LAGWX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAGWX vs. WCMLX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAGWX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAGWX has more cash in the bank: 2.02B vs. WCMLX (43M). LAGWX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: LAGWX (0.02) vs WCMLX (0.00). LAGWX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LAGWX (52 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LAGWX (0.94). LAGWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LAGWX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LAGWX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). LAGWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.16 vs. WCMLX (1.70). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 12.48 vs. LAGWX (-13.04).
| LAGWX | WCMLX | LAGWX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.99 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.79 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.164 | 7.232 | 182% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.02B | 43M | 4,686% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.16 | 1.70 | 658% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.31 | 33.88 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.04 | 12.48 | -104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement