Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFYX vs RMFCX
LAFYX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFYX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated I
Price$20.04
Change+$0.14 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.22B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
LAFYX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFYX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFYX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAFYX (6.22B). LAFYX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAFYX (1.68) vs RMFCX (1.27). LAFYX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFYX (27 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAFYX (0.44). LAFYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFYX: RMFCX (250) vs LAFYX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. LAFYX (10.72). LAFYX (63.61) and RMFCX (61.83) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFYX | RMFCX | LAFYX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.91 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.91 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.781 | 9.596 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 109B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 1.27 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.72 | 11.47 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.52 | 29.27 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.61 | 61.83 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.86 | 79.21 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement