Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFVX vs RMFEX
LAFVX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFVX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R6
Price$20.31
Change-$0.14 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.38B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$62.90
Change-$0.49 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LAFVX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFVX vs. RMFEX commentary
Dec 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFVX is a StrongBuy and RMFEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAFVX (6.38B). LAFVX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: LAFVX (1.59) vs RMFEX (1.43). LAFVX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFVX (10 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). RMFEX (0.62) is less costly to investors than LAFVX (0.39). LAFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAFVX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.19 vs. LAFVX (5.63). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 57.31 vs. LAFVX (44.17).
| LAFVX | RMFEX | LAFVX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.62 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.62 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.579 | 16.703 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.38B | 112B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 1.43 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.63 | 9.19 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.13 | 31.21 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.17 | 57.31 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.70 | 105.64 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement