Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFVX vs RMEBX
LAFVX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFVX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R6
Price$21.11
Change+$0.14 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.56B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.63
Change+$0.22 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
LAFVX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFVX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFVX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAFVX (6.56B). LAFVX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LAFVX (1.24) vs RMEBX (1.10). LAFVX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFVX (11 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFVX (0.39). LAFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LAFVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFVX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LAFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.14 vs. RMEBX (10.40). LAFVX (44.12) and RMEBX (43.71) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFVX | RMEBX | LAFVX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.07 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 1.07 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.939 | 2.467 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.56B | 112B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.10 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.14 | 10.40 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.34 | 27.99 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.12 | 43.71 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.04 | 108.89 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers