Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFTX vs RMFEX
LAFTX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFTX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R5
Price$20.05
Change+$0.13 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.22B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$59.82
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
LAFTX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFTX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFTX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAFTX (6.22B). LAFTX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: LAFTX (1.68) vs RMFEX (1.53). LAFTX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFTX (10 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). RMFEX (0.62) is less costly to investors than LAFTX (0.44). LAFTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAFTX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.81 vs. LAFTX (10.72). RMFEX (64.33) and LAFTX (63.56) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFTX | RMFEX | LAFTX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.62 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.62 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.720 | 9.748 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 109B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.68 | 1.53 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.72 | 11.81 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.50 | 30.45 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.56 | 64.33 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.95 | 86.20 | 51% |