Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFTX vs RMFCX
LAFTX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFTX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R5
Price$20.45
Change+$0.07 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.45B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.35
Change+$0.23 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LAFTX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFTX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFTX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAFTX (6.45B). LAFTX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAFTX (1.60) vs RMFCX (1.18). LAFTX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFTX (11 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAFTX (0.44). LAFTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFTX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.68 vs. RMFCX (8.05). RMFCX (46.17) and LAFTX (44.22) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFTX | RMFCX | LAFTX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.91 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.91 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.229 | 9.696 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.45B | 112B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 1.18 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.68 | 8.05 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.13 | 28.89 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.22 | 46.17 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.18 | 91.60 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement