Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFSX vs RMFEX
LAFSX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R4
Price$19.88
Change+$0.13 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.22B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$59.82
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
LAFSX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAFSX (6.22B). RMFEX (1.53) and LAFSX (1.46) have matching dividends . LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFSX (10 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFSX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAFSX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.81 vs. LAFSX (10.36). RMFEX (64.33) and LAFSX (61.97) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFSX | RMFEX | LAFSX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.62 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.62 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.601 | 9.748 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 109B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 1.53 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.36 | 11.81 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.52 | 30.45 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.97 | 64.33 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.06 | 86.20 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement