Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFSX vs RMFCX
LAFSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R4
Price$19.18
Change-$0.19 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.01B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.52
Change-$0.44 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.76B
LAFSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. LAFSX (6.01B). LAFSX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAFSX (1.59) vs RMFCX (1.31). LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFSX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAFSX (0.69). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. LAFSX (7.29). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.85 vs. LAFSX (55.92).
| LAFSX | RMFCX | LAFSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.503 | 6.021 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.01B | 106B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 1.31 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.29 | 8.70 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.97 | 28.43 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.92 | 59.85 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 69.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement