Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFSX vs RMFCX
LAFSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R4
Price$19.88
Change+$0.13 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.22B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
LAFSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAFSX (6.22B). LAFSX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAFSX (1.46) vs RMFCX (1.27). LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFSX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAFSX (0.69). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. LAFSX (10.36). LAFSX (61.97) and RMFCX (61.83) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFSX | RMFCX | LAFSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.601 | 9.596 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 109B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 1.27 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.36 | 11.47 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.52 | 29.27 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.97 | 61.83 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.06 | 79.21 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement