Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFSX vs RMFCX
LAFSX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R4
Price$20.76
Change+$0.13 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.4B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.27
Change+$0.38 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.09B
LAFSX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAFSX (6.4B). LAFSX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAFSX (1.42) vs RMFCX (1.24). LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFSX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAFSX (0.69). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFSX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.42 vs. RMFCX (6.41). LAFSX (64.28) and RMFCX (63.20) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFSX | RMFCX | LAFSX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.665 | 13.245 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.4B | 111B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.24 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.42 | 6.41 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.45 | 42.10 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.28 | 63.20 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.98 | 103.62 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement