Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFSX vs RMEBX
LAFSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R4
Price$20.04
Change+$0.10 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.24B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.75
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54B
LAFSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAFSX (6.24B). LAFSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LAFSX (1.46) vs RMEBX (1.12). LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFSX (10 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFSX (0.69). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.26 vs. LAFSX (9.81). RMEBX (59.35) and LAFSX (58.28) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFSX | RMEBX | LAFSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.467 | 11.253 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.24B | 111B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 1.12 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.81 | 11.26 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.65 | 30.31 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.28 | 59.35 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.11 | 80.17 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers