Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFSX vs RMEBX
LAFSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R4
Price$20.64
Change-$0.03 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.57B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.41
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.52B
LAFSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAFSX (6.57B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAFSX: RMEBX (1.10) vs LAFSX (1.03). LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFSX (11 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFSX (0.69). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). LAFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.49 vs. RMEBX (11.75). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 42.51 vs. LAFSX (40.12).
| LAFSX | RMEBX | LAFSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.402 | 2.045 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.57B | 112B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.10 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.49 | 11.75 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.12 | 27.46 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.12 | 42.51 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.71 | 108.03 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers