Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFSX vs RMEBX
LAFSX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFSX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R4
Price$20.86
Change+$0.18 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.34B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.36
Change+$0.51 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.18B
LAFSX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFSX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFSX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAFSX (6.34B). LAFSX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LAFSX (1.35) vs RMEBX (1.05). LAFSX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFSX (10 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFSX (0.69). LAFSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). LAFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: LAFSX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.81 vs. LAFSX (4.51). RMEBX (55.95) and LAFSX (55.42) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFSX | RMEBX | LAFSX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.231 | 13.527 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.34B | 111B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 1.05 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.51 | 4.81 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.10 | 38.19 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.42 | 55.95 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.68 | 89.36 | 58% |