Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFRX vs RMFEX
LAFRX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFRX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R3
Price$20.72
Change+$0.08 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.32B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.89
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
LAFRX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFRX vs. RMFEX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFRX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAFRX (6.32B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAFRX: RMFEX (1.46) vs LAFRX (1.13). LAFRX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFRX (18 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFRX (0.94) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAFRX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.28 vs. LAFRX (4.24). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 59.52 vs. LAFRX (54.02).
| LAFRX | RMFEX | LAFRX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.62 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.62 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.999 | 13.941 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.32B | 111B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.46 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.24 | 5.28 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.13 | 40.09 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.02 | 59.52 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.52 | 98.84 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers