Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFRX vs RMFEX
LAFRX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFRX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R3
Price$20.42
Change+$0.15 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.27B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.85
Change+$0.06 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
LAFRX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFRX vs. RMFEX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFRX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAFRX (6.27B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAFRX: RMFEX (1.49) vs LAFRX (1.19). LAFRX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFRX (18 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFRX (0.94) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAFRX (0) vs RMFEX (250). LAFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.88 vs. RMFEX (8.06). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 58.84 vs. LAFRX (53.45).
| LAFRX | RMFEX | LAFRX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.62 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.62 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.770 | 11.638 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.27B | 109B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.19 | 1.49 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.88 | 8.06 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.09 | 33.39 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.45 | 58.84 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.23 | 98.59 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers