Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFRX vs RMFCX
LAFRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFRX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R3
Price$20.72
Change+$0.08 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.32B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.51
Change+$0.17 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
LAFRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFRX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAFRX (6.32B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAFRX: RMFCX (1.20) vs LAFRX (1.13). LAFRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFRX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAFRX (0.94) and RMFCX (0.91) have similar cost to investors . LAFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFRX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.96 vs. LAFRX (4.24). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 57.10 vs. LAFRX (54.02).
| LAFRX | RMFCX | LAFRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.91 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.999 | 13.689 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.32B | 111B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 1.20 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.24 | 4.96 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.13 | 38.79 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.02 | 57.10 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.52 | 91.18 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers