Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFQX vs RMFEX
LAFQX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFQX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R2
Price$20.13
Change+$0.10 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.24B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.79
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54B
LAFQX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFQX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFQX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAFQX (6.24B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAFQX: RMFEX (1.53) vs LAFQX (1.12). LAFQX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFQX (18 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFQX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAFQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAFQX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.74 vs. LAFQX (9.48). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 62.99 vs. LAFQX (56.41).
| LAFQX | RMFEX | LAFQX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.62 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.62 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.239 | 11.527 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.24B | 111B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 1.53 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.48 | 11.74 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.47 | 32.08 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.41 | 62.99 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.54 | 88.96 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers