Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFQX vs RMFEX
LAFQX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFQX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R2
Price$20.85
Change-$0.30 (-1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.42B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.97
Change-$0.71 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
LAFQX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFQX vs. RMFEX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFQX is a StrongBuy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAFQX (6.42B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAFQX: RMFEX (1.46) vs LAFQX (1.03). LAFQX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFQX (18 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFQX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). LAFQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: LAFQX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.02 vs. LAFQX (4.21). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 57.30 vs. LAFQX (49.82).
| LAFQX | RMFEX | LAFQX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.62 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.62 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.935 | 15.396 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 112B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.46 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.21 | 7.02 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.24 | 31.78 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.82 | 57.30 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.42 | 101.84 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers