Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFQX vs RMFCX
LAFQX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFQX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R2
Price$20.85
Change+$0.12 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.4B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.27
Change+$0.38 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.09B
LAFQX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFQX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFQX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAFQX (6.4B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAFQX: RMFCX (1.24) vs LAFQX (1.09). LAFQX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFQX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAFQX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAFQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAFQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFQX (0) vs RMFCX (250). LAFQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.99 vs. RMFCX (6.41). RMFCX (63.20) and LAFQX (62.30) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFQX | RMFCX | LAFQX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.91 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.91 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.319 | 13.245 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.4B | 111B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.24 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.99 | 6.41 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.16 | 42.10 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.30 | 63.20 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.91 | 103.62 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement