Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFQX vs RMFCX
LAFQX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFQX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated R2
Price$20.85
Change-$0.30 (-1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.42B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.57
Change-$0.70 (-1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
LAFQX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFQX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFQX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAFQX (6.42B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAFQX: RMFCX (1.21) vs LAFQX (1.03). LAFQX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFQX (18 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAFQX (1.04) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAFQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). LAFQX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: LAFQX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. LAFQX (4.21). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.90 vs. LAFQX (49.82).
| LAFQX | RMFCX | LAFQX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.91 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 0.91 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.935 | 15.093 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 112B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.21 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.21 | 6.67 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.24 | 30.56 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.82 | 54.90 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.42 | 94.04 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers