Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFLX vs RWMHX
LAFLX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts LAFLX vs RWMHX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value A
Price$15.94
Change+$0.87 (+5.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.11M
American Funds Washington Mutual R5E
Price$66.01
Change-$1.03 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
LAFLX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFLX vs. RWMHX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFLX is a Hold and RWMHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. LAFLX (111M). RWMHX pays higher dividends than LAFLX: RWMHX (1.36) vs LAFLX (0.25). LAFLX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: LAFLX (7 years) vs RWMHX (10 years). LAFLX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). LAFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). RWMHX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFLX: RWMHX (250) vs LAFLX (1500). LAFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.01 vs. RWMHX (5.40). RWMHX return over 5 years is better than : 37.20 vs. LAFLX (0.55).
| LAFLX | RWMHX | LAFLX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.41 | 234% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.41 | 400% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.038 | 1.523 | 200% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111M | 208B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 1.36 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.01 | 5.40 | 297% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.30 | 30.10 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.55 | 37.20 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.94 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement