Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFLX vs RWEBX
LAFLX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFLX vs RWEBX
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value A
Price$15.01
Change+$0.08 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.07M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.32
Change+$0.27 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.87B
LAFLX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFLX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFLX is a Hold and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 206B vs. LAFLX (74.1M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than LAFLX: RWEBX (0.76) vs LAFLX (0.58). LAFLX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: LAFLX (6 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). LAFLX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). LAFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFLX: RWEBX (250) vs LAFLX (1500). LAFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.49 vs. RWEBX (3.29). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.88 vs. LAFLX (11.25).
| LAFLX | RWEBX | LAFLX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.06 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 1.06 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.668 | 9.079 | 162% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.1M | 206B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 0.76 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.49 | 3.29 | 349% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.38 | 38.78 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.25 | 45.88 | 25% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 73.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement