Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFFX vs RMFEX
LAFFX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFFX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated A
Price$20.71
Change+$0.08 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.32B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.89
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
LAFFX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFFX vs. RMFEX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFFX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAFFX (6.32B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAFFX: RMFEX (1.46) vs LAFFX (1.35). LAFFX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFFX (76 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFFX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFFX: RMFEX (250) vs LAFFX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.28 vs. LAFFX (4.51). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 59.52 vs. LAFFX (55.42).
| LAFFX | RMFEX | LAFFX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.62 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.62 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 76 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.153 | 13.941 | 87% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.32B | 111B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 1.46 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.51 | 5.28 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.13 | 40.09 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.42 | 59.52 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.82 | 98.84 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement