Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFFX vs RMFEX
LAFFX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFFX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated A
Price$20.08
Change+$0.10 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.24B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.79
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54B
LAFFX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFFX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFFX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAFFX (6.24B). RMFEX (1.53) and LAFFX (1.46) have matching dividends . LAFFX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFFX (76 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFFX (0.69) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFFX: RMFEX (250) vs LAFFX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.74 vs. LAFFX (9.85). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 62.99 vs. LAFFX (58.35).
| LAFFX | RMFEX | LAFFX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.62 | 111% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.62 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 76 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.448 | 11.527 | 73% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.24B | 111B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 1.53 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.85 | 11.74 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.66 | 32.08 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.35 | 62.99 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.31 | 88.96 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers