Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFFX vs RMFCX
LAFFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFFX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated A
Price$20.30
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.45B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.35
Change+$0.23 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LAFFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFFX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAFFX (6.45B). LAFFX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: LAFFX (1.38) vs RMFCX (1.18). LAFFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFFX (76 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than LAFFX (0.69). LAFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFFX: RMFCX (250) vs LAFFX (1000). LAFFX (8.31) and RMFCX (8.05) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.17 vs. LAFFX (42.59).
| LAFFX | RMFCX | LAFFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 76 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.879 | 9.696 | 102% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.45B | 112B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 1.18 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.31 | 8.05 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.05 | 28.89 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.59 | 46.17 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.87 | 91.60 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers