Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFFX vs RMEBX
LAFFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFFX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated A
Price$19.21
Change-$0.20 (-1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.07B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.84
Change-$0.46 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.6B
LAFFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFFX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 107B vs. LAFFX (6.07B). LAFFX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LAFFX (1.59) vs RMEBX (1.16). LAFFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFFX (75 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFFX (0.69). LAFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFFX: RMEBX (250) vs LAFFX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.54 vs. LAFFX (7.28). RMEBX (58.69) and LAFFX (55.92) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFFX | RMEBX | LAFFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 75 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.441 | 5.923 | 58% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.07B | 107B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.59 | 1.16 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.28 | 8.54 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.91 | 27.89 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.92 | 58.69 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.00 | 68.22 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement