Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFFX vs RMEBX
LAFFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFFX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated A
Price$20.71
Change+$0.08 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.32B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.85
Change+$0.16 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.88B
LAFFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFFX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAFFX (6.32B). LAFFX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LAFFX (1.35) vs RMEBX (1.05). LAFFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFFX (76 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFFX (0.69). LAFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFFX: RMEBX (250) vs LAFFX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.81 vs. LAFFX (4.51). RMEBX (55.95) and LAFFX (55.42) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFFX | RMEBX | LAFFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 76 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.153 | 13.527 | 90% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.32B | 111B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 1.05 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.51 | 4.81 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.13 | 38.19 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.42 | 55.95 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.82 | 89.36 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers