Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFFX vs RMEBX
LAFFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFFX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated A
Price$20.42
Change+$0.07 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.27B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.70
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
LAFFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFFX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAFFX (6.27B). LAFFX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LAFFX (1.42) vs RMEBX (1.09). LAFFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFFX (76 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFFX (0.69). LAFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFFX: RMEBX (250) vs LAFFX (1000). LAFFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.15 vs. RMEBX (7.57). RMEBX (55.29) and LAFFX (54.83) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFFX | RMEBX | LAFFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 76 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.907 | 11.308 | 88% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.27B | 109B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.09 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.15 | 7.57 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.93 | 31.59 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.83 | 55.29 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.63 | 89.40 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers