Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFFX vs RMEBX
LAFFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFFX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated A
Price$20.30
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.45B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.72
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LAFFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFFX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAFFX (6.45B). LAFFX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: LAFFX (1.38) vs RMEBX (1.03). LAFFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFFX (76 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than LAFFX (0.69). LAFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFFX: RMEBX (250) vs LAFFX (1000). LAFFX (8.31) and RMEBX (7.97) have marching annual gain over last year. RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.21 vs. LAFFX (42.59).
| LAFFX | RMEBX | LAFFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.07 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 76 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.879 | 9.599 | 103% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.45B | 112B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 1.03 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.31 | 7.97 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.05 | 28.41 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.59 | 45.21 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.87 | 90.05 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers