Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFCX vs RMFEX
LAFCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFCX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated C
Price$20.94
Change-$0.30 (-1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.42B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$61.97
Change-$0.71 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
LAFCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFCX is a StrongBuy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAFCX (6.42B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAFCX: RMFEX (1.46) vs LAFCX (0.65). LAFCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFCX (29 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFCX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFCX: RMFEX (250) vs LAFCX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.02 vs. LAFCX (2.60). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 57.30 vs. LAFCX (45.65).
| LAFCX | RMFEX | LAFCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.62 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.62 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.960 | 15.396 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 112B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.46 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.60 | 7.02 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.22 | 31.78 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.65 | 57.30 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.22 | 101.84 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers