Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFCX vs RMFEX
LAFCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFCX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated C
Price$20.13
Change+$0.19 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.38B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$62.90
Change+$0.30 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LAFCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFCX is a Hold and RMFEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAFCX (6.38B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAFCX: RMFEX (1.43) vs LAFCX (0.66). LAFCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFCX (29 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFCX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFCX: RMFEX (250) vs LAFCX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.59 vs. LAFCX (1.44). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 54.35 vs. LAFCX (35.71).
| LAFCX | RMFEX | LAFCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.62 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.62 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.630 | 15.801 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.38B | 112B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.43 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.44 | 6.59 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.29 | 28.84 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.71 | 54.35 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.79 | 98.05 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement