Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFCX vs RMFEX
LAFCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts LAFCX vs RMFEX
Lord Abbett Affiliated C
Price$20.48
Change-$0.07 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.27B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.85
Change+$0.06 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
LAFCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFCX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAFCX (6.27B). RMFEX pays higher dividends than LAFCX: RMFEX (1.49) vs LAFCX (0.71). LAFCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: LAFCX (29 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). LAFCX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). LAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFCX: RMFEX (250) vs LAFCX (1000). LAFCX (8.42) and RMFEX (8.06) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 58.84 vs. LAFCX (51.01).
| LAFCX | RMFEX | LAFCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.62 | 232% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.62 | 232% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.415 | 11.638 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.27B | 109B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 1.49 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.42 | 8.06 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.53 | 33.39 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.01 | 58.84 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.70 | 98.59 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers