Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFCX vs RMFCX
LAFCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFCX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated C
Price$20.13
Change+$0.19 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.38B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.49
Change+$0.31 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LAFCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFCX is a Hold and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAFCX (6.38B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAFCX: RMFCX (1.18) vs LAFCX (0.66). LAFCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFCX (29 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). LAFCX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFCX: RMFCX (250) vs LAFCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.27 vs. LAFCX (1.44). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.02 vs. LAFCX (35.71).
| LAFCX | RMFCX | LAFCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.91 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.91 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.630 | 15.500 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.38B | 112B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.18 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.44 | 6.27 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.29 | 27.68 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.71 | 52.02 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.79 | 90.44 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers