Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFCX vs RMFCX
LAFCX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFCX vs RMFCX
Lord Abbett Affiliated C
Price$20.94
Change-$0.30 (-1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.42B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.57
Change-$0.70 (-1.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
LAFCX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFCX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFCX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAFCX (6.42B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than LAFCX: RMFCX (1.21) vs LAFCX (0.65). LAFCX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: LAFCX (29 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). LAFCX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). LAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFCX: RMFCX (250) vs LAFCX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. LAFCX (2.60). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.90 vs. LAFCX (45.65).
| LAFCX | RMFCX | LAFCX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.91 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 0.91 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.960 | 15.093 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 112B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.21 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.60 | 6.67 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.22 | 30.56 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.65 | 54.90 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.22 | 94.04 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers