Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFCX vs RMEBX
LAFCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFCX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated C
Price$20.94
Change-$0.30 (-1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.42B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.91
Change-$0.71 (-1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.28B
LAFCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFCX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAFCX (6.42B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAFCX: RMEBX (1.05) vs LAFCX (0.65). LAFCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFCX (29 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LAFCX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFCX: RMEBX (250) vs LAFCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.37 vs. LAFCX (2.60). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 52.05 vs. LAFCX (45.65).
| LAFCX | RMEBX | LAFCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.07 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.07 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.960 | 13.637 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.42B | 112B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 1.05 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.60 | 5.37 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.22 | 29.45 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.65 | 52.05 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.22 | 87.37 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers