Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFCX vs RMEBX
LAFCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFCX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated C
Price$20.22
Change+$0.10 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.24B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.75
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54B
LAFCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFCX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. LAFCX (6.24B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAFCX: RMEBX (1.12) vs LAFCX (0.73). LAFCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFCX (29 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LAFCX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFCX: RMEBX (250) vs LAFCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.26 vs. LAFCX (9.05). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 59.35 vs. LAFCX (54.51).
| LAFCX | RMEBX | LAFCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.07 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.07 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.026 | 11.253 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.24B | 111B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 1.12 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.05 | 11.26 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.28 | 30.31 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.51 | 59.35 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.88 | 80.17 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers