Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFCX vs RMEBX
LAFCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFCX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated C
Price$20.48
Change-$0.07 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.27B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.71
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
LAFCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFCX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAFCX (6.27B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAFCX: RMEBX (1.09) vs LAFCX (0.71). LAFCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFCX (29 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LAFCX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFCX: RMEBX (250) vs LAFCX (1000). LAFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.42 vs. RMEBX (7.57). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.29 vs. LAFCX (51.01).
| LAFCX | RMEBX | LAFCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.07 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.07 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.415 | 11.308 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.27B | 109B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 1.09 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.42 | 7.57 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.53 | 31.59 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.01 | 55.29 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.70 | 89.40 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers