Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFCX vs RMEBX
LAFCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFCX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated C
Price$19.33
Change-$0.20 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.07B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.84
Change-$0.46 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.6B
LAFCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFCX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 107B vs. LAFCX (6.07B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAFCX: RMEBX (1.16) vs LAFCX (0.83). LAFCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFCX (29 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LAFCX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFCX: RMEBX (250) vs LAFCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.54 vs. LAFCX (6.56). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 58.69 vs. LAFCX (52.41).
| LAFCX | RMEBX | LAFCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.07 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.07 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.155 | 5.923 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.07B | 107B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.83 | 1.16 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.56 | 8.54 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.93 | 27.89 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.41 | 58.69 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.29 | 68.22 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement