Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFCX vs RMEBX
LAFCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFCX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated C
Price$20.42
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.45B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.71
Change+$0.23 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
LAFCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFCX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. LAFCX (6.45B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAFCX: RMEBX (1.03) vs LAFCX (0.66). LAFCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFCX (29 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LAFCX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFCX: RMEBX (250) vs LAFCX (1000). RMEBX (7.97) and LAFCX (7.58) have marching annual gain over last year. RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.21 vs. LAFCX (38.94).
| LAFCX | RMEBX | LAFCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.07 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.07 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.180 | 9.599 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.45B | 112B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.03 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.58 | 7.97 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.42 | 28.41 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.94 | 45.21 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.44 | 90.05 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers