Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFCX vs RMEBX
LAFCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts LAFCX vs RMEBX
Lord Abbett Affiliated C
Price$20.07
Change+$0.13 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.22B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.79
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
LAFCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFCX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. LAFCX (6.22B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than LAFCX: RMEBX (1.12) vs LAFCX (0.73). LAFCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: LAFCX (29 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). LAFCX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). LAFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFCX: RMEBX (250) vs LAFCX (1000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.31 vs. LAFCX (9.59). RMEBX (60.65) and LAFCX (58.06) have equivalent 5 years return.
| LAFCX | RMEBX | LAFCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.07 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.07 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.224 | 9.495 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.22B | 109B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 1.12 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.59 | 11.31 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.19 | 28.70 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 58.06 | 60.65 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.96 | 77.57 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers