Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LAFAX vs RERCX
LAFAX vs RERCX Comparison
Open Charts LAFAX vs RERCX
Columbia Acorn International Sel A
Price$28.62
Change+$0.21 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets199.79M
American Funds EUPAC R3
Price$61.84
Change+$0.19 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.4B
LAFAX vs RERCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LAFAX vs. RERCX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAFAX is a Hold and RERCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERCX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. LAFAX (200M). LAFAX pays higher dividends than RERCX: LAFAX (2.65) vs RERCX (0.49). LAFAX was incepted earlier than RERCX: LAFAX (25 years) vs RERCX (23 years). LAFAX (1.44) is less costly to investors than RERCX (1.12). LAFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RERCX (35.00). RERCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LAFAX: RERCX (250) vs LAFAX (2000). RERCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.19 vs. LAFAX (4.21). RERCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.81 vs. LAFAX (2.00).
| LAFAX | RERCX | LAFAX / RERCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.12 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.12 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.711 | 18.558 | 90% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 200M | 135B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.65 | 0.49 | 541% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.21 | 5.19 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.33 | 49.58 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.00 | 14.81 | 13% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.23 | 47.52 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement