Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADVX vs NRGSX
LADVX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts LADVX vs NRGSX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth R6
Price$35.07
Change+$0.40 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.04B
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$63.83
Change+$0.89 (+1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.56B
LADVX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADVX vs. NRGSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADVX is a Buy and NRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.56B vs. LADVX (2.04B). NRGSX pays higher dividends than LADVX: NRGSX (0.07) vs LADVX (0.00). LADVX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: LADVX (10 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). NRGSX (0.74) is less costly to investors than LADVX (0.59). LADVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). LADVX (0) and NRGSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LADVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.30 vs. NRGSX (-14.38). LADVX return over 5 years is better than : -2.40 vs. NRGSX (-7.82).
| LADVX | NRGSX | LADVX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.74 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.74 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.705 | -3.565 | -440% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 8.56B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.30 | -14.38 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.30 | -2.58 | -1,678% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.40 | -7.82 | 31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.96 | 7.54 | 782% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement