Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADTX vs NRGSX
LADTX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts LADTX vs NRGSX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth R5
Price$34.55
Change+$0.39 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.04B
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$62.94
Change-$0.08 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.46B
LADTX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADTX vs. NRGSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADTX is a Buy and NRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.46B vs. LADTX (2.04B). NRGSX pays higher dividends than LADTX: NRGSX (0.07) vs LADTX (0.00). LADTX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: LADTX (10 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). NRGSX (0.74) is less costly to investors than LADTX (0.69). LADTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). LADTX (0) and NRGSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LADTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.20 vs. NRGSX (-14.38). LADTX return over 5 years is better than : -2.96 vs. NRGSX (-7.82).
| LADTX | NRGSX | LADTX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.74 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.74 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.585 | -3.565 | -437% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 8.46B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.20 | -14.38 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.91 | -2.58 | -1,662% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.96 | -7.82 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.70 | 7.54 | 752% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement