Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADTX vs NRGSX
LADTX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts LADTX vs NRGSX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth R5
Price$32.27
Change-$1.77 (-5.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.03B
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$61.95
Change-$0.68 (-1.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.43B
LADTX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADTX vs. NRGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADTX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.43B vs. LADTX (2.03B). LADTX pays higher dividends than NRGSX: LADTX (0.17) vs NRGSX (0.07). LADTX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: LADTX (10 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). NRGSX (0.74) is less costly to investors than LADTX (0.69). LADTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). LADTX (0) and NRGSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LADTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.68 vs. NRGSX (-13.93). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -6.57 vs. LADTX (-7.82).
| LADTX | NRGSX | LADTX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.74 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.74 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.078 | -4.162 | -362% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.03B | 8.43B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 0.07 | 263% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.68 | -13.93 | -62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.12 | -1.73 | -2,660% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.82 | -6.57 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.26 | 10.77 | 439% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement