Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADSX vs WCMNX
LADSX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts LADSX vs WCMNX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth R4
Price$26.12
Change+$0.30 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.04B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.65
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.69M
LADSX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADSX vs. WCMNX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADSX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADSX has more cash in the bank: 2.04B vs. WCMNX (43.7M). LADSX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . LADSX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: LADSX (10 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than LADSX (0.94). LADSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). LADSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMNX: LADSX (0) vs WCMNX (1000). LADSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.94 vs. WCMNX (-1.37). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 0.74 vs. LADSX (-6.65).
| LADSX | WCMNX | LADSX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.24 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 2.04 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.357 | 7.486 | 205% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 43.7M | 4,670% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.94 | -1.37 | -578% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.82 | 21.03 | 199% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.65 | 0.74 | -900% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.51 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement