Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADSX vs WCMLX
LADSX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LADSX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth R4
Price$26.92
Change+$1.03 (+3.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.64
Change+$0.83 (+6.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
LADSX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADSX vs. WCMLX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADSX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADSX has more cash in the bank: 2.05B vs. WCMLX (47.1M). LADSX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . LADSX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LADSX (11 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LADSX (0.94). LADSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LADSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LADSX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). LADSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.90 vs. WCMLX (8.52). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -5.30 vs. LADSX (-21.77).
| LADSX | WCMLX | LADSX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.99 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.79 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.074 | 6.395 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 47.1M | 4,350% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.90 | 8.52 | 222% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.42 | 19.51 | 228% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.77 | -5.30 | 410% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement