Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADSX vs WCMLX
LADSX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LADSX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth R4
Price$26.19
Change-$0.23 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.06
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.58M
LADSX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADSX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADSX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADSX has more cash in the bank: 2.05B vs. WCMLX (44.6M). LADSX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . LADSX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LADSX (11 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LADSX (0.94). LADSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LADSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LADSX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). LADSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.43 vs. WCMLX (7.33). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -4.16 vs. LADSX (-16.88).
| LADSX | WCMLX | LADSX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.99 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.79 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.920 | 9.331 | 181% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 44.6M | 4,601% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.43 | 7.33 | 183% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.30 | 33.90 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.88 | -4.16 | 406% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.01 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement