Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADSX vs NRGSX
LADSX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts LADSX vs NRGSX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth R4
Price$25.73
Change-$0.05 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.03B
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$62.63
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.53B
LADSX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADSX vs. NRGSX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADSX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.53B vs. LADSX (2.03B). NRGSX pays higher dividends than LADSX: NRGSX (0.07) vs LADSX (0.00). LADSX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: LADSX (10 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). LADSX (0.94) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). LADSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). LADSX (0) and NRGSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LADSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.43 vs. NRGSX (-13.93). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -6.57 vs. LADSX (-13.19).
| LADSX | NRGSX | LADSX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.74 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.74 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.866 | -4.162 | -357% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.03B | 8.53B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.43 | -13.93 | -61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.04 | -1.73 | -2,598% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.19 | -6.57 | 201% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.02 | 10.77 | 232% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement