Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADSX vs NRGSX
LADSX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts LADSX vs NRGSX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth R4
Price$26.12
Change+$0.30 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.04B
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$62.94
Change-$0.08 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.46B
LADSX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADSX vs. NRGSX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADSX is a Buy and NRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.46B vs. LADSX (2.04B). NRGSX pays higher dividends than LADSX: NRGSX (0.07) vs LADSX (0.00). LADSX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: LADSX (10 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). LADSX (0.94) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). LADSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). LADSX (0) and NRGSX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LADSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.94 vs. NRGSX (-14.38). LADSX return over 5 years is better than : -6.65 vs. NRGSX (-7.82).
| LADSX | NRGSX | LADSX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.74 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.74 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.357 | -3.565 | -431% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 8.46B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.94 | -14.38 | -55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.82 | -2.58 | -1,620% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.65 | -7.82 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.51 | 7.54 | 458% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers