Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADQX vs WCMLX
LADQX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LADQX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth R2
Price$23.75
Change+$0.88 (+3.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.64
Change+$0.83 (+6.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
LADQX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADQX vs. WCMLX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADQX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADQX has more cash in the bank: 2.05B vs. WCMLX (47.1M). LADQX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . LADQX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LADQX (18 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LADQX (1.29). LADQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LADQX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LADQX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). LADQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.45 vs. WCMLX (8.52). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -5.30 vs. LADQX (-24.10).
| LADQX | WCMLX | LADQX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.99 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.79 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.042 | 6.395 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 47.1M | 4,350% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.45 | 8.52 | 216% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.90 | 19.51 | 220% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.10 | -5.30 | 454% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement