Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADPX vs WCMNX
LADPX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts LADPX vs WCMNX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth P
Price$24.07
Change+$0.28 (+1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.04B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.85
Change+$0.20 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.36M
LADPX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADPX vs. WCMNX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADPX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADPX has more cash in the bank: 2.04B vs. WCMNX (44.4M). LADPX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . LADPX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: LADPX (28 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than LADPX (1.14). LADPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). LADPX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMNX: LADPX (0) vs WCMNX (1000). LADPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.73 vs. WCMNX (-1.37). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 0.74 vs. LADPX (-8.31).
| LADPX | WCMNX | LADPX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.24 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 2.04 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.128 | 7.486 | 202% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 44.4M | 4,597% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.73 | -1.37 | -563% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.03 | 21.03 | 195% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.31 | 0.74 | -1,126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.86 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement