Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADPX vs WCMLX
LADPX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LADPX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth P
Price$24.07
Change+$0.28 (+1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.04B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.06
Change+$0.20 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.36M
LADPX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADPX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADPX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADPX has more cash in the bank: 2.04B vs. WCMLX (44.4M). LADPX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . LADPX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LADPX (28 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LADPX (1.14). LADPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LADPX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LADPX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). LADPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.73 vs. WCMLX (-1.14). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.99 vs. LADPX (-8.31).
| LADPX | WCMLX | LADPX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.99 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.79 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.128 | 7.621 | 199% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 44.4M | 4,597% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.73 | -1.14 | -677% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.03 | 21.83 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.31 | 1.99 | -418% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.86 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement