Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADFX vs WCMNX
LADFX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts LADFX vs WCMNX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth F
Price$27.54
Change-$0.22 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.03B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.59
Change-$0.03 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.09M
LADFX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADFX vs. WCMNX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADFX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADFX has more cash in the bank: 2.03B vs. WCMNX (43.1M). LADFX pays higher dividends than WCMNX: LADFX (0.12) vs WCMNX (0.00). LADFX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: LADFX (18 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than LADFX (0.79). LADFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). LADFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMNX: LADFX (0) vs WCMNX (1000). LADFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.28 vs. WCMNX (1.42). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 11.12 vs. LADFX (-11.14).
| LADFX | WCMNX | LADFX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.24 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 2.04 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.240 | 7.092 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.03B | 43.1M | 4,719% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.12 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.28 | 1.42 | 795% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.93 | 32.97 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.14 | 11.12 | -100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.37 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement