Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADFX vs WCMNX
LADFX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts LADFX vs WCMNX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth F
Price$29.26
Change+$1.13 (+4.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$14.42
Change+$0.82 (+6.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
LADFX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADFX vs. WCMNX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADFX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADFX has more cash in the bank: 2.05B vs. WCMNX (47.1M). LADFX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . LADFX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: LADFX (18 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than LADFX (0.79). LADFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). LADFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMNX: LADFX (0) vs WCMNX (1000). LADFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.04 vs. WCMNX (8.34). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : -6.49 vs. LADFX (-20.54).
| LADFX | WCMNX | LADFX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.24 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 2.04 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.063 | 6.421 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 47.1M | 4,350% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.04 | 8.34 | 228% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.03 | 18.68 | 241% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.54 | -6.49 | 317% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.25 | N/A | - |