Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADFX vs WCMLX
LADFX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LADFX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth F
Price$28.71
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.08
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.65M
LADFX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADFX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADFX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADFX has more cash in the bank: 2.05B vs. WCMLX (44.7M). LADFX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . LADFX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LADFX (18 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LADFX (0.79). LADFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LADFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LADFX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). LADFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.12 vs. WCMLX (8.14). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -4.02 vs. LADFX (-14.85).
| LADFX | WCMLX | LADFX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.99 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.79 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.051 | 9.487 | 190% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 44.7M | 4,591% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.12 | 8.14 | 186% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.42 | 33.08 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.85 | -4.02 | 369% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement