Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADFX vs WCMLX
LADFX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LADFX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth F
Price$26.51
Change-$1.45 (-5.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.03B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.25
Change-$0.44 (-3.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.88M
LADFX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADFX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADFX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADFX has more cash in the bank: 2.03B vs. WCMLX (41.9M). LADFX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: LADFX (0.11) vs WCMLX (0.00). LADFX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LADFX (18 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LADFX (0.79). LADFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LADFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LADFX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). LADFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.29 vs. WCMLX (-2.98). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 4.74 vs. LADFX (-15.84).
| LADFX | WCMLX | LADFX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.99 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.79 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.005 | 6.454 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.03B | 41.9M | 4,833% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.29 | -2.98 | -144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.11 | 22.89 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.84 | 4.74 | -334% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement