Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADCX vs WCMNX
LADCX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts LADCX vs WCMNX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth C
Price$11.58
Change+$0.13 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.04B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$13.85
Change+$0.20 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.36M
LADCX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADCX vs. WCMNX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADCX is a Buy and WCMNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADCX has more cash in the bank: 2.04B vs. WCMNX (44.4M). LADCX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . LADCX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: LADCX (29 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than LADCX (1.69). LADCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). LADCX (1000) and WCMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LADCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.10 vs. WCMNX (-1.37). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 0.74 vs. LADCX (-20.36).
| LADCX | WCMNX | LADCX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.24 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 2.04 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.486 | 7.486 | 193% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 44.4M | 4,597% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.10 | -1.37 | -517% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.74 | 21.03 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.36 | 0.74 | -2,757% |
| Returns for 10 years | -21.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement