Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADCX vs WCMNX
LADCX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts LADCX vs WCMNX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth C
Price$11.92
Change+$0.42 (+3.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.05B
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$14.42
Change+$0.82 (+6.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
LADCX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADCX vs. WCMNX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADCX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADCX has more cash in the bank: 2.05B vs. WCMNX (47.1M). LADCX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . LADCX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: LADCX (30 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than LADCX (1.69). LADCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMNX (83.00). LADCX (1000) and WCMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. LADCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.90 vs. WCMNX (8.34). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : -6.49 vs. LADCX (-33.26).
| LADCX | WCMNX | LADCX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.24 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 2.04 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.930 | 6.421 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 47.1M | 4,350% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.90 | 8.34 | 215% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.07 | 18.68 | 220% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.26 | -6.49 | 513% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement