Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
LADCX vs WCMLX
LADCX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts LADCX vs WCMLX
Lord Abbett Developing Growth C
Price$11.58
Change+$0.13 (+1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.04B
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.06
Change+$0.20 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.36M
LADCX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
LADCX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LADCX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LADCX has more cash in the bank: 2.04B vs. WCMLX (44.4M). LADCX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . LADCX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: LADCX (29 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than LADCX (1.69). LADCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 112.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). LADCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: LADCX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). LADCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.10 vs. WCMLX (-1.14). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.99 vs. LADCX (-20.36).
| LADCX | WCMLX | LADCX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 0.99 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.69 | 1.79 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.486 | 7.621 | 190% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 44.4M | 4,597% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.10 | -1.14 | -621% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.74 | 21.83 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | -20.36 | 1.99 | -1,023% |
| Returns for 10 years | -21.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement