LAD
Price
$355.25
Change
-$1.41 (-0.40%)
Updated
Dec 12, 11:45 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.65B
68 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RUSHA
Price
$58.82
Change
+$0.32 (+0.55%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
4.56B
68 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

LAD vs RUSHA

Header iconLAD vs RUSHA Comparison
Open Charts LAD vs RUSHABanner chart's image
Lithia Motors
Price$355.25
Change-$1.41 (-0.40%)
Volume$519
Capitalization8.65B
Rush Enterprises
Price$58.82
Change+$0.32 (+0.55%)
Volume$597.76K
Capitalization4.56B
LAD vs RUSHA Comparison Chart in %
LAD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RUSHA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
LAD vs. RUSHA commentary
Dec 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LAD is a Buy and RUSHA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2025
Stock price -- (LAD: $356.66 vs. RUSHA: $58.82)
Brand notoriety: LAD and RUSHA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Automotive Aftermarket industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: LAD: 108% vs. RUSHA: 97%
Market capitalization -- LAD: $8.65B vs. RUSHA: $4.56B
LAD [@Automotive Aftermarket] is valued at $8.65B. RUSHA’s [@Automotive Aftermarket] market capitalization is $4.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry ranges from $66.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Automotive Aftermarket] industry is $4.35B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

LAD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • LAD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RUSHA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the long-term than LAD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LAD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • LAD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RUSHA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RUSHA is a better buy in the short-term than LAD.

Price Growth

LAD (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а +9.74% price change this week, while RUSHA (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +7.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +60.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +44.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

LAD is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Automotive Aftermarket (+60.72% weekly)

The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAD($8.65B) has a higher market cap than RUSHA($4.57B). RUSHA has higher P/E ratio than LAD: RUSHA (17.45) vs LAD (10.31). RUSHA YTD gains are higher at: 7.876 vs. LAD (0.514). LAD has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.38B vs. RUSHA (682M). LAD has more cash in the bank: 417M vs. RUSHA (211M). RUSHA has less debt than LAD: RUSHA (1.75B) vs LAD (14.7B). LAD has higher revenues than RUSHA: LAD (37.6B) vs RUSHA (7.69B).
LADRUSHALAD / RUSHA
Capitalization8.65B4.57B189%
EBITDA2.38B682M349%
Gain YTD0.5147.8767%
P/E Ratio10.3117.4559%
Revenue37.6B7.69B489%
Total Cash417M211M198%
Total Debt14.7B1.75B838%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LAD vs RUSHA: Fundamental Ratings
LAD
RUSHA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2331
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6921
SMR RATING
1..100
5857
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4651
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7336
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RUSHA's Valuation (35) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LAD (68) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than LAD’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LAD (69) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than LAD’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's SMR Rating (57) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is in the same range as LAD (58) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew similarly to LAD’s over the last 12 months.

LAD's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (51) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that LAD’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.

RUSHA's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LAD (73) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than LAD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LADRUSHA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
LAD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RUSHA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SBRVX15.580.40
+2.64%
Segall Bryant & Hamill Sm Cp Val Ret
DEVLX70.971.50
+2.16%
Nomura Small Cap Value A
MXERX6.710.13
+1.98%
Empower S&P SmallCap 600® Index Instl
GSIHX22.990.14
+0.61%
Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps A
CIAGX11.34N/A
N/A
AB Concentrated International Growth A

LAD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LAD has been closely correlated with AN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LAD jumps, then AN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LAD
1D Price
Change %
LAD100%
+1.26%
AN - LAD
78%
Closely correlated
-0.92%
ABG - LAD
77%
Closely correlated
+1.71%
GPI - LAD
76%
Closely correlated
+1.65%
PAG - LAD
72%
Closely correlated
+0.15%
RUSHA - LAD
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.55%
More

RUSHA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RUSHA
1D Price
Change %
RUSHA100%
+6.54%
RUSHB - RUSHA
85%
Closely correlated
+8.93%
AN - RUSHA
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.81%
LAD - RUSHA
64%
Loosely correlated
+6.12%
PAG - RUSHA
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.77%
ABG - RUSHA
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.78%
More